To be completely honest I am still confused on what this organization does exactly. I have visited the site a few times in the past two days and while I think I understand the purpose and goals of the group, I am unsure what they are doing to achieve them. At first I was even confused about what the 21st century skills actually were, but after downloading the complete the full definitions document I understood better. The skills are basically the characteristics of what a productive successful adult looks like.
I almost feel like the language used on the site is partly to blame. As a person who doesn't learn well from reading, I felt my eyes glaze over when I started reading some of the pages. I like things that are direct, I do not need the fancy language. Tell me straight out what your goal is and what you are doing to achieve it on the home page and go in to more details with the various page. I feel like there is no one concise page to get that information and I had to do a lot of clicking reading and rereading to get the gist of this organization.
Or maybe I am just slow on the uptake? Did anyone else experience any of this confusion?
I think the most important thing this organization does is having business, education and politics comes together as one and work towards setting and achieving standards that are important for our students to become successful adults. All aspects of our society need to be on the same page. I was surprised, and impressed, by the list of organizations and corporations that are involved with the partnership. I think the variety of participants is a key in developing meaningful expectations.
I know our assignment asked if we disagreed with any information on the site, however, I keep going back to a concept I strongly agree with,and since I didn't find anything that I disagree with passionately I will discuss the positive idea. I The idea that assessments have to be readjusted as well as instruction. The site states, "Standardized tests alone can measure only a few of the important skills and knowledge students should learn. A balance of assessments, including high-quality standardized testing along with effective classroom assessments, offers students a powerful way to master the content and skills central to success." Our country relies to heavily on standardized tests as a measure of success, which is unfair to our students. Some bright students are just poor test takers. Or in my situation, I have students who come in reading at a kindergarten level and by the end of the year they are at a 1st grade level. Despite all the progress they make, the 3rd grade NJASK test is still out of many of their reach. Why do we deem them unsuccessful? The progress they made is significant and in my opinion a success for them. We need a variety of assessments that can give a more accurate picture of success.
As an educator facing these expectations of productive adults in society I think we all have to step it up a notch. I think as early as Preschool many of these skills can be addressed and built upon each following school year. All areas of the framework have aspects that can be addressed as early as age 4. Global awareness, creativity, appropriate socials skills and more are as important at age 4 as they are as adult. I think as an educator we have to up our expectations of our students. The idea of "good enough," has to disappear and replaced with an idea to always challenge them to look further into their work, into themselves.
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I would have to agree with you I really did not understand what they do. I am on the same page with just telling me what you are about then go into more detail in other links or pages. I do agree with the fact that we have to have everyone on the same page, but my concern with some of the groups would be are they doing it for the right reasons or the wrong reasons. I know at our school we have a field house project that is going on. This project could have been done in about one year, but it has been three years. The reason is because there are too many people having an input into what goes on. They have changed their minds and the plans so many times it takes forever to get things done. I guess what I am saying is with business and politics having a say I just question what is going to happen. I also agree with the fact that we put too much weight on standardized test. I have students for example that do great on the test, but cannot put it to use in real world problems. That is great if you have the knowledge, but what good does that do if you cannot use it in the working world.
ReplyDeleteI have to admit, I didn't think anything of the businesses being partners until I read your response. You do have a point. I am conflicted about how I feel about the list of businesses involved now. One hand, who better to be involved and help set standards then the very places our students will be working for or with? Yet, I see the concern. Big business his notoriously known for looking out for their own best interests and wallets, not neccessarily the best interests of the communities they serve. Your comments give me a lot to think about.
ReplyDeleteI agree that standardized testing has taken away from our country's educational system. Teachers are forced to work on the standards and yes the skill that this organization is trying to encourage is being thrown away to the side. I think they are trying to provide awareness that this problem does exist.
ReplyDeleteBecause of testing, those students that are not up to "par" with the grade level expectations are the burden of the teacher, but what we have to remember is that our job is to teach. Even if we teach 3rd grade and we have a student reading on a Kindergarten level and "only tests" at a 1st grade level, then have we done our job? I feel we have, they have learned a year’s worth of work, isn't that what matters.
The 21st century site, I feel is suppose to foster this type of thinking. Yes the standards are important but we can't forget that they need to be able to function in sociey too.
Because of testing, those students that are not up to "par" with the grade level expectations are the burden of the teacher, but what we have to remember is that our job is to teach. Even if we teach 3rd grade and we have a student reading on a Kindergarden level and "only tests" at a 1st grade level, then have we done our job? I feel we have, they have learned a years worth of work, isn't that wht matters.
The 21st century site I feel is supose to foster this type of thinking. Yes the standards are important but we can't forget that they need to be able to function in sociey too.
I agree with your statement that the site was difficult to comprehend at first. Actually - only after further investigation and re-reading the mission statement 2 or 3 times did I begin to understand the meaning of this organization. It is best when websites - especially of organizations - come right out and tell you what they're all about, and then get into the details. It's almost like scaffolding . . . maybe more teachers should be website designers, or company spokespeople! Although I think being honest and up front might not be what every corporation wants.
ReplyDeleteThis leads me to address the corporate partnership componenent of the Partnership for 21st Century Skills that was brought up in a previous comment. I think it is great that businesses are involved in P21 because they are the entities that will be hiring these students, they have money to spend that many districts do not, and they most likely have impressive facilities with many learning oppurtunities that could never be imitated in the classroom. If we get things like "Nature's Classroom" why not "Corporate World Classroom," or "Real Business Classroom?"
I agree that the site is not very good. This is especially disappointing because it is supposed to be promoting 21st century skills. To do justice to the topic, this site should be much more impressive.
ReplyDeletermerola- This is a side note, but don't you think that having a 3rd grader with kindergarten skills is a problem in the first place. It is great if you can move them along a grade level so they have 1st grade skills but they are still 2 years behind and will continue to get more behind as they get into upper grades where teachers can spend less time getting students caught up. How can this child be successful in 4th grade if they are so far behind?
Dan - I also like the corporate partnership. Corporations donote billions of dollars a year to different organizations. Much of this money could go to education through corporate partnerships and technology/21st century skills grants. It would help out shools and it would help out the corporations because they would know that their future employees were learning the necessary skills to become good employees.